Important
Adult Education Organizations
Group
2
Introduction
Each member of our group has had
different experiences with adult education which follows what we have learned
in this class. Adult education is defined by your position and what experiences
one has endured (Merriam & Brockett, 2007). All of the members of our group
are in different stages of their careers and their involvement in different
types of adult education.
Rob has worked with First Choice
for Women of Muncie, The Muncie Innovation Connector, the Indiana Small
Business Development Centers, and various corporations. He became interested in
the Tennessee technology center system after doing some research on the
Tennessee community college system. Christy has worked as a volunteer at the
Indiana State Museum for several years with her family and worked teaching in
prison. While there, she worked with several local groups to help the prisoners
to get more educational materials to enhance their learning. Recently, since
working with the Massive, open, online course (MOOC) she is developing, she
became interesting in promoting lifelong learning and researched The Coalition
of Lifelong Learning Organizations (COLLO). Kandance meanwhile has worked with
both AmeriCorps and with the Big Bend Goodwill Services. AmeriCorps is a
service learning program and Goodwill is a program to help unemployed people
find jobs. Kandace is also interested in how Ivy Tech Community College offers
free technology workshops for faculty, staff, and adjunct instructors. Kristin has
worked with many programs, specifically ones that are in communities. She is
involved with alumni committees, and the Girl Scouts. Through this class, she
found the Maine College Transitions Initiative and has been very interested in
that program because of knowing so many people who are non-traditional
students. For this paper we will go into
detail about the Tennessee Technology Centers and COLLO.
Tennessee
Technology Centers
The Tennessee technology center
system is a part of the state of Tennessee’s post-secondary education system,
which includes the state’s 13 community colleges, seven universities, and the
University of Tennessee, as well as the state’s 27 technology centers. Under
the direction of the governor and Tennessee Board of Regents, the Tennessee
Higher Education Commission is the governing body for the entire Tennessee post-secondary
education system (“The public agenda for Tennessee higher education 2010-2015”,
n.d). Of the 27 technology centers, 26 are free-standing institutions (“Tennessee
Technology Centers”, n.d.). Participation rates vary widely, with under 400
students enrolled at Jacksboro to over 6,000 at Murfreesboro (“The public
agenda for Tennessee higher education 2010-2015”, n.d.).
The Tennessee technology center
system was started by legislation enacted by the Tennessee General Assembly in
1963. The system was originally labeled area vocational technical schools, managed
by the State Board of Education, and was more secondary in setting, but the
state of Tennessee transferred control of the area vocational technical schools
to the Tennessee Board of Regents and Tennessee Higher Education Commission in
1983 (“TTC history”, n.d.). This initiated the transfer of the role of the
centers from the secondary to post-secondary habitat, though it was not until
1993 that they were renamed as technology centers. This radically advanced and
changed the role of these centers to mostly adult-oriented in nature (Hoops,
2010).
These technology centers are
primarily funded (68%) by the state (“The public agenda for Tennessee higher
education 2010-2015”, n.d.), and they are highly coordinated through the Vice
Chancellor of the Tennessee Board of Regents and central office staff. This
assures consistency and quality among the institutions, while also giving the
technology center system its own unique identity under the Tennessee Higher
Education Commission (Hoops, 2010). The centers collectively employ 818 people
and offer certificates in over 50 unique technical fields. The centers served nearly
32,000 students in 2011. The majority (88%) of students enrolled in the
technology centers are locals. The technology centers received $54 million in
state funding fiscal year 2011-2012 (“The public agenda for Tennessee higher
education 2010-2015”, n.d.).
These programs are a healthy
balance of cohort and Montessori style, typically running 20 months. Students develop strong relationships with
their instructor and cohorts, as they work with them in a highly structured
academic lab setting, usually around 20 hours per week. The programs offered by
the technology centers are different than traditional community college
vocational programs in that they are based on working “lab” hours instead of
credit hours (Hoops, 2010). For example, the Automotive Technology Program at
the Tennessee Technology Center at Athens requires 2,160 “clock” hours. That
particular program is broken down into five terms, each with specific
skill-building objectives. (“Automotive technology”, n.d.). Any necessary
remediation is handled seamlessly with lab instruction. Even though the
programs are somewhat cohort-based, new students can enter these programs at any
time during the 20-month period. The more senior students become leaders in the
lab, assisting the instructor with less advanced students. The groups are
typically limited to 20 participants per instructor, and the programs are
relatively low cost to the participants (Hoops, 2010). Using the previously
mentioned Athens Technology Center’s Automotive Technology Program as an
example, the cost for the program is just $7,800 all-inclusive (“Automotive
technology”, n.d.). When one considers the potential return on investment, this
can be very attractive to potential students.
The Full-Time-Equivalent (FTE)
salary for Tennessee technology center faculty members is $36,720, suggesting
most faculty members are likely adjuncts. Given the vocational and technical
nature of these programs, this is not overly surprising. Each center has its
own director, and funds are appropriated from the state as one line item for
the entire technology center system (“Tennessee Higher Education Commission”,
n.d.a).
Roles and
Responsibilities
The role of the Tennessee
technology center system is rather well defined. According to Hoops (2010) and
the Tennessee Higher Education Commission (n.d.), the technology centers are to
be premier provider of adult workforce development in the state of Tennessee.
These centers provide much needed workers in highly skilled trades, and give
residents the opportunity to earn a good wage. In essence, the role of the
technology centers is to prepare local residents for employment.
Impact
The
Tennessee technology center program has been recognized regularly for its
impact in adult education and the Tennessee economy and workforce supply. According
to the Gonzalez (2012) of the Chronicle and Hoops (2010) of Complete College
America, the Tennessee technology center system is a national model for adult
and higher education.
The
data support this recognition. The statewide system achieves 75% graduation and
81% job placement rates (Gonzalez, 2012; Hoops, 2010). In the previously
mentioned example, the Automotive Technology Program at the Tennessee
Technology Center at Athens had amazing results, with 94% completion and 93%
placement in 2012 (“Automotive technology”, n.d.).
Finally,
the Tennessee Higher Education Commission recognizes the impact of the
technology centers, and lists further fostering the success of them among its
most salient goals in the Public Agenda
for Tennessee Higher Education 2010-2015 (“The public agenda for Tennessee
higher education 2010-2015”, n.d.). The Commission has asserted one of its
greatest objectives is to increase the offering, efficiency, quality, and total
certificates of these centers in order to continue to meet the labor gap.
Implications
The
Tennessee technology center is a model that can empower other states to
institutionalize and segregate adult vocational training from community
colleges. Given community colleges have largely been pulled away from this
mission because of the need for remediation and a less expensive alternative to
four-year state institutions for associates degrees and general education,
isolating this unique education form has proven to be very efficient and effective.
The
Coalition of Lifelong Learning Organizations
The Coalition of Lifelong Learning
Organizations (COLLO) was established in 1973 for groups to join that share a
common interest in the area of lifelong learning (“About COLLO”, n.d.). By
bringing people together as members, cooperation is fostered and a network has
been created that make lifelong learning a priority in educational matters.
COLLO has a very active role in the promotion of lifelong learning and gives
several awards to those who contributions have helped the cause. COLLO believes
that lifelong learning is a must and they accomplish goals by bringing groups
together instead of taking on issues alone.
Roles and
Responsibilities
The purpose of COLLO is to developing, maintain, and
improve lifelong learning education (“About COLLO”, n.d.). This is an area
where information must be shared and resources must be announced. The role of
COLLO is to facilitate this information exchange and help to plan events that
will help in the areas of lifelong learning. They feel it is their
responsibility to provide lifelong learning for all people and that all adults
should have equal access to learning opportunities.
COLLO also carries the burden of
educating the public on matters of adult education and lifelong learning
(“About COLLO”, n.d.). By showing the value and importance of learning, they
serve as an advocate for the members of the group. They also work with other
groups to achieve their goals, as it is not about who gets credit, but getting
education to all adults that want it. And also explaining to those who do not
want more education, why it will benefit their lives.
Impact
COLLO has made a big impact on the
world of adult education (“Success Stories”, n.d.). By working with groups such
as the Joint Commission of Community Colleges, they helped to assist in the
Tech Prep legislation to help community colleges. They have worked with the
National Coalition for Literacy to strengthen the continuum of adult
education. Working with several groups,
COLLO created grassroots networks to fight against the elimination of 14
literacy programs around the country. All of the programs were saved and
received an increase in funds from the federal government.
Working as advocates for different
areas, members of COLLO helped to pass many acts in the legislature (“Success
Stories”, n.d.). These include the passage or the reauthorization of the Adult
Education Act, the Higher Education Act, the Vocational Education Act, and the
Homeless Assistance Act. These are very important acts that have a huge impact
on the field of adult education. Without the assistance of COLLO, many of these
acts would have not be passed or reauthorized.
By having members from organizations
such as The American Association for Adult & Continuing Education, the
American Council on Education, the Association for Continuing Higher Education,
the Council on Adult and Experiential Learning, the American Distance Education
Consortium, and numerous groups in various locales, the impact that COLLO has
had and is still having on the field of adult learning is immense (“Member
Organizations”, n.d.).
Implications
By bringing different areas of adult education
together, COLLO is making a difference in the field of adult education. As we
have learned, the field of adult education is so vast and encompasses so many
different areas and types of learning and teaching, it tends to become
fragmented. This works against the field as a whole and is not good for anyone.
This organization may be the catalyst behind a real organization of adult
education which gives great hope for the field. It shows how by working
together, we all can make a greater difference.
Table
1: Summary of Important Adult Education Organizations
|
Tennessee
Technology Centers
|
COLLO
|
Year
Founded
|
1963
as secondary-based institutions, 1984 as post-secondary, adult-based centers
|
1973
was when it was formally established
|
Mission
& Goals
|
Premier
provider of workforce development in Tennessee
|
To
promote social welfare by developing, maintaining, and improving lifelong
learning.
|
Roles
& Responsibilities
|
Provide
efficient training to allow residents access to jobs requiring technical
skills. To provide skilled laborers to bridge the labor gap.
|
Exchange
information, build cooperation, review adult education programs, promote best
practices
|
Other
Important Information
|
Includes
27 technology centers. Served over 31,000 students in 2011-2012.
|
Makes
goals possible that individual organizations cannot alone
|
Impact
|
Recognized
as a national model. High completion (75%) and placement (81%) rates.
|
Worked
with groups to create Tech Prep, creates grassroots organizations to save
literacy programs, build adult learning archives, helped in passing the Adult
Education Act
|
Implications
|
Serves
as a national model that can help ease the burden of community colleges being
forced to deviate from vocational training initiatives.
|
They
represent schools, learners, leaders, etc. to enhance the field of lifelong
learning by fostering cooperation and coordinating efforts
|
References
Gonzalez,
J. (2012, July 30). Less choice, more structure for students in a Tennessee
system, it works. Chronicle of Higher
Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/
article/Less-Choice-More-Structure/133193/
Hoops,
J. (2010, June). A working model for
student success: The Tennessee technology centers. Retrieved from http://www.completecollege.org/resources_and_reports/
Merriam,
S. B., and Brockett, R. G. (2007). The
profession and practice of adult education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Tennessee
Board of Regents. (n.d.). Tennessee
Technology Centers. Retrieved from http://www.tbr.edu/schools/default.aspx?id=2654
Tennessee
Higher Education Commission. (n.d.). 2011-2012
Tennessee Higher Education Fact Book. Retrieved from
http://www.state.tn.us/thec/Index/News/ News.html
Tennesse
Higher Education Commission. (n.d.). The
public agenda for Tennessee higher education 2010-2015. Retrieved from
http://tn.gov/thec/Divisions/PPR/ planning/master_plan.html
Tennessee
Technology Center at Athens. (n.d.). Automotive
technology. Retrieved from http://www.ttcathens.edu/full-time-programs/automotive-technology
Tennessee
Technology Center at Dickson (n.d.). TTC
history. Retrieved from http://www.ttcdickson.edu/ttc-history
The
Coalition of Lifelong Learning. (n.d.). About
COLLO. Retrieved from http://www.thecollo.org/aboutus.php#statements
The
Coalition of Lifelong Learning. (n.d.). Member
Organizations. Retrieved from http://www.thecollo.org/rolodex.php#officers
The
Coalition of Lifelong Learning. (n.d.). Success
stories. Retrieved from http://www.thecollo.org/stories.php#1